mercoledì 28 dicembre 2011

Phishing: una mail cerca di rubare le password degli Apple ID


Phishing: una mail cerca di rubare le password degli Apple ID

scam 111227 Phishing: una mail cerca di rubare le password degli Apple IDIntego ha messo in guardia i clienti di Apple da una azione di phishing "ben congegnata" con la quale dei malintenzionati stanno cercando di raccogliere i dati di accesso associati agli Apple ID di migliaia di utenti dei servizi forniti da Cupertino. La mail incriminata giunge dall'insospettabile indirizzo di posta elettronica: appleid@id.apple.com e, come in ogni mail di phishing che si rispetti, richiede all'utente di aggiornare le sue credenziali perché sono "out of date", ovvero troppo vecchie.

Il link della mail sembra portare poi a http://store.apple.com (l'indirizzo del sicuro Apple Online Store) ma invia invece lo sfortunato lettore della mail a una pagina con una realistica schermata di login.


Continua a leggere: Phishing: una mail cerca di rubare le password degli Apple ID (...)

Phishing: una mail cerca di rubare le password degli Apple ID, pubblicato su TheAppleLounge il 28/12/2011

© Lorenzo Paletti per TheAppleLounge, 2011. | Commenta! |
Tag: , ,




Original Page: http://www.theapplelounge.com/?p=71331



Inviato da iPad

martedì 27 dicembre 2011

Buon natale a tutti

Buon natale a tutti i miei lettori



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Un programma di allenamento efficace


Un programma di allenamento efficace

Un programma di allenamento semplice ed efficace per chi vuole finalmente trasformare l'attività fisica in un'abitudine.

programma allenamento

"Una bella camminata di 5km è molto più efficace per un uomo infelice di tutte le medicine e gli psicologi del mondo."

Paul Dudley White.

Scommetto un panettone che almeno uno dei tuoi buoni propositi per l'anno nuovo riguarda la tua forma fisica.

Molti di noi, soprattutto dopo le abbuffate di questi giorni, desiderano, in un modo o nell'altro, rimettersi in forma e gennaio è il mese prescelto per diventare dei maniaci del fitness… peccato poi che, tempo 2-3 settimane, ci ritroviamo inesorabilmente a ricadere nelle nostre care, vecchie cattive abitudini.

Ma perché falliamo?

Rendere l'attività fisica un'abitudine

Qualche anno fa ormai, ti ho parlato delle 10 abitudini che mi hanno cambiato la vita: tra le prime cinque ho messo l'attività fisica.

Lo sport ha una lunghissima lista di pro e scarsissimi contro: accresce il nostro benessere psico-fisico, migliora il nostro umore, ci rende più belli e tonici, ci permette di essere più resistenti allo stress, ci permette di allenare la nostra mente, etc. etc. Potrei riempire l'intero articolo con i benefici dell'attività fisica, eppure…

…eppure molti di noi hanno difficoltà a renderla una vera e propria abitudine.

Magari ci iscriviamo in palestra con grande entusiasmo, ma dopo le prime settimane, iniziamo a saltare 1 lezione, poi 2, poi 3, per ritrovarci infine ad aver rinunciato ad un intero mese di allenamenti; ed ecco che ci ripromettiamo che dal prossimo mese ricominceremo: ritrovandoci però in un circolo vizioso fatto di "stop & go" senza fine.

La nostra mancanza di costanza ed auto-disciplina influisce negativamente sui nostri risultati, che a loro volta minano la nostra autostima e la nostra motivazione ad andare in palestra.

Come possiamo spezzare questo circolo vizioso?

Nella mia esperienza, il primo passo per rendere l'attività fisica parte integrante della nostra quotidianità e quello di renderla un'abitudine.

Si, grazie al mazzo! Lo so che devo renderla un'abitudine Andre, ma non ce la faccio!!!

Se non riusciamo a fare dell'attività sportiva una nostra abitudine quotidiana è perché commettiamo l'errore di partire in quarta! Esageriamo nei primi giorni, come se fossimo dei provetti Rambo, e poi, spompati, collassiamo sul divano.

Per questo motivo, oggi voglio proporti un programma di allenamento semplice ed efficace. L'obiettivo di questo programma non è quello di trasformarti in un foto-modello ultra-scolpito, ma piuttosto quello di rendere l'attività fisica un'abitudine irrinunciabile.

Le peculiarità di questo programma di allenamento sono infatti:

  • la semplicità. Pochi e semplici esercizi mirati per un allenamento completo.
  • la praticità. Puoi fare questo allenamento in casa, senza necessità di particolare attrezzatura.
  • l'efficacia. Per passare al livello successivo nella tua preparazione fisica, devi innanzitutto imparare le basi.

Vediamo questo programma nel dettaglio, ma prima una piccola nota.

Nota dell'autore: ricordati, io non sono un esperto di fitness, ne un medico. Prima di iniziare qualsiasi attività sportiva è opportuno che tu faccia un consulto con il tuo medico. Il programma di allenamento proposto in questo articolo è stato ideato dall'esperta di fitness Gillian Mounsey. Gli esercizi sono molto semplici, ma è opportuno farli sempre con attenzione per evitare infortuni.

Il programma di allenamento

Il programma ideato da Gillian Mounsey prevede 3 giorni di allenamento ed un impegno massimo di 30-40 minuti per ogni sessione di allenamento.

Se pensi di non avere abbastanza tempo per questo allenamento, ti consiglio di dare un'occhiata a questa tabellina e scoprire quanto tempo stai sprecando in attività inutili.

Ma vediamo come è organizzato l'allenamento e quali sono gli esercizi da svolgere:

Giorno 1

Il primo giorno (lunedì sarebbe l'ideale), prevede un allenamento completo con 20 minuti di attività cardio e 10-20 minuti di esercizi forza. Per esigenze di tempo è possibile separare l'attività cardio (al mattino ad esempio) da quella forza (al pomeriggio ad esempio), anche se è consigliabile svolgere l'allenamento in una singola sessione.

Ricapitolando, il primo giorno dovrai fare:

  • 20 minuti di passeggiata/corsa. L'obiettivo è, a parità di tempo, aumentare la distanza percorsa ogni settimana.
  • 10 minuti di esercizi forza. In questo caso, l'obiettivo è aumentare il tempo di allenamento di 2 minuti ogni 2 settimane, fino ad arrivare a 20 minuti.

Gli esercizi forza

Come detto gli esercizi sono semplici ed efficaci. Nello specifico il primo giorno di allenamento prevede 3 tipologie di esercizi che dovranno essere ripetuti in sequenza, senza pause. Al termine di ogni round dovrai prenderti 1 minuto di pausa, e poi ricominciare con la sequenza di 3 esercizi, finché non raggiungerai il tempo limite di 10 minuti.

I 3 esercizi sono:

  • 5 flessioni sulle braccia.
  • 10 addominali.
  • 15 piegamenti sulle gambe.

Di seguito le istruzioni video per compiere gli esercizi correttamente:

Flessioni sulle braccia

link al video

Addominali

link al video

Piegamenti sulle gambe

link al video

Giorno 2

Prenditi un giorno di riposo e poi passa al giorno 2 del programma di allenamento. Nel secondo giorno introdurremo un po' di varietà per evitare che l'allenamento sia monotono. Il giorno 2 di questo programma di allenamento prevede infatti di utilizzare un mazzo di carte per scegliere gli esercizi da effettuare. Si hai capito bene: un mazzo di carte.

Ogni seme corrisponderà ad una specifica tipologia di esercizio (4 semi, 4 esercizi) ed il numero riportato nella carta indicherà il numero di ripetizioni che dovrai effettuare. Per farla semplice:

  • Estrai una carta dal tuo mazzo. Se non hai un mazzo di carte a portata di mano, puoi utilizzare questo generatore di carte casuali on-line.
  • Esegui l'esercizio corrispondente al seme della carta estratta. Nel prossimo paragrafo vedremo le 4 tipologie di esercizi.
  • Ripeti l'esercizio le volte corrispondenti al numero della carta. Se si tratta di una figura, puoi ripetere l'esercizi 5 o 10 volte, a te la scelta.

Ecco le 4 tipologie di esercizio e le istruzioni video:

Carte Cuori = Salto della corda

link al video

Quadri = Tricipiti

link al video

Se non hai 2 panche a casa, puoi semplicemente appoggiarti con le mani su una sedia e con i piedi a terra.

Fiori = Battito alternato gambe

link al video

Picche = Affondi in avanti

link al video

Tutto chiaro? uhm… non mi fido mica: che esercizio devi fare se la prima carta è un 7 di picche?! Bravo, 7 affondi in avanti.

Giorno 3

Prendi un altro giorno di riposo e poi passa al giorno 3 del programma di allenamento. In questo terzo giorno di allenamento torniamo agli esercizi core, per un programma di allenamento completo che comprende:

  • 20 minuti di passeggiata/corsa. L'obiettivo è, a parità di tempo, aumentare la distanza percorsa ogni settimana.
  • 10 minuti di esercizi forza. Come detto, al giorno 3 ripeteremo gli esercizi core:
  • 5 flessioni sulle braccia.
  • 10 addominali.
  • 15 piegamenti sulle gambe.

Come hai potuto vedere non si tratta di un programma di allenamento spaziale e molti sportivi seri probabilmente storceranno il naso, ma l'obiettivo di questo programma è molto semplice: eliminare i fronzoli, fornirti esercizi semplici ed efficaci, ma soprattutto aiutarti a consolidare l'abitudine all'esercizio fisico.

Spero ti sia utile, come lo è stato per me quando ho dovuto affrontare un periodo di lavoro particolarmente intenso e non ho voluto rinunciare alla mia attività fisica.

Andrea.

le Guide certificate dal Blog

raggiungere obiettivi
Raggiungi i Tuoi Obiettivi nell'Anno Nuovo. Audiolibro e dispensa che ti insegneranno a raggiungere i tuoi obiettivi in modo scientifico. A mio avviso si tratta di un corso sintetico, immediato ed efficace per realizzare finalmente i buoni propositi di inizio anno.
Tecniche di Memoria e Apprendimento Rapido. Un videocorso completo con eserciziario on-line e tutoring di un docente esperto per apprendere rapidamente le migliori tecniche di memorizzazione per ricordare numeri, codici, vocaboli, immagini, date e lingue straniere.
Energy Training. Puoi avere 1.000 obiettivi, ma se non hai l'energia per raggiungerli rimarrai sempre bloccato. Energy training è un completissimo corso multimediale, in formato audio mp3 con trascrizione PDF sui segreti del benessere e della energia personale.
sicuro di te in 60 giorni
Sicuro di Te in 60 Giorni. Un guida pratica ed efficace che ti aiuterà a riconquistare la tua autostima e la tua confidenza in 60 giorni (ora più, ora meno ;-). La caratteristica vincente di questa guida è sicuramente l'insieme di esercizi e tecniche, da praticare in diversi ambienti della vita quotidiana, che ti garantiscono un reale cambiamento grazie all'esperienza diretta.
Corso di Respirazione
La Magia della Respirazione. Una guida completa per ritrovare la propria energia personale attraverso la più semplice ed efficace delle attività umane: la respirazione. Una raccolta completa di avanzate tecniche di respirazione.
Meditazione guidata
Meditazione guidata. L'audio-corso in italiano con cui ho iniziato a meditare. Comprende le tracce mp3 con le meditazioni guidate e tutte le istruzioni pratiche per chi si avvicina per la prima volta alla meditazione.

Contribuisci ad aumentare l'autostima dell'Autore

Diventa un follower su Twitter e ricevi i tuoi 160 caratteri di motivazione quotidiana
Diventa fan del Blog EfficaceMente su Facebook: + motivazione, - farmville!

5 Articoli che dovresti leggere


Original Page: http://www.efficacemente.com/?p=5913



Inviato da iPad

A checklist for creating excellent mind maps http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/mind-map-checklist/



Inviato da iPad

Ok, ho aperto un blog… e adesso?


Ok, ho aperto un blog… e adesso?

Ti ricordi quella mini guida divisa in 4 articoli e dedicata a chi ha appena aperto un blog? Bene, qualche giorno fa mi sono reso conto che mancava un tassello fondamentale: la conquista dei primi lettori fidelizzati.

Pensavi che pubblicati i primi articoli tutto il web sarebbe accorso sul tuo blog per commentare, condividere e gonfiare le tue statistiche? No, non funziona così e oggi voglio darti qualche consiglio base per farti conoscere sul web.

Commenta i post dei tuoi colleghi

Cerca blog simili al tuo. Abbonati ai feed, leggi gli articoli per avere sempre nuovi spunti di lavoro e inizia a farti conoscere dagli autori e dai lettori commentando gli articoli.

Commentare non significa fare spam: nella tua posizione è importante lasciare commenti articolati, ricchi di spunti e riflessioni personali. Devono essere dei commenti capaci di dare un valore al tuo intervento, così aumentano le possibilità di attirare l'attenzione e portare nuovo traffico al tuo blog.

Dedicati ai guest post

Scrivere un guest post vuol dire pubblicare un articolo su un altro blog che contiene uno o più link verso le tue risorse. È una situazione win-win: chi ti ospita riceve dei contenuti gratuiti da pubblicare e tu guadagni dei link di buona qualità, oltre a raggiungere un pubblico nuovo.

Hai tutto da guadagnare nella pubblicazione dei guest post ma ti conviene seguire un paio di consigli:

  • Scegli blog che trattano il tuo argomento in modo da avere link contestualizzati.
  • Per i link diretti al tuo blog  utilizza degli anchor text con keyword performanti, ovviamente se possibile!
  • Attenzione alla scrittura, alle fonti, alle immagini e ai link di approfondimento: tutto deve essere di qualità.

E soprattutto ricordati che sei ospite a casa di un amico: rispetta le regole, non fare il furbo (o la furba) proponendo comunicati stampa o testi duplicati, non scambiare il guest blogging come un modo per riciclare vecchi articoli. Se ti interessa anche My Social Web è interessato ai guest post!

Ancora qualche consiglio? Basta dare uno sguardo ai piccoli errori che rovinano la tua carriere di guest blogger!

Forum, che passione!

Un altro trucco per portare nuovi lettori al tuo blog è partecipare ai forum che ruotano intorno ai tuoi interessi. Che tu sia appassionato di cucina o di informatica cambia poco: ci sono forum dedicati a tutti gli argomenti e ci vuole un attimo per iscriverti.

Ma questo non significa che puoi fare tutto quello che ti passa per la testa. Devi conquistarti la fiducia degli altri utenti intervento dopo intervento, mostrando le tue capacità e la qualità del tuo blog, ma senza esagerare nell'auto celebrazione.

Facilita la condivisione

Il modo più semplice per invogliare i lettori a condividere i tuoi post e creare un bel passa parola? Usare i bottoni di social sharing. Non devi avere i pulsanti di tutte le piattaforme esistenti, bastano quelli più importanti come il "Mi Piace" di Facebook, ReTweet e Google Plus.

Usa i social

Facebook e Twitter possono facilitare la tua opera (far conoscere il blog a nuovi lettori interessati) ma togliti dalla testa di creare un profilo, buttare giù qualche link e sederti in poltrona ad aspettare visite a manetta. Ecco qualche consiglio per muovere i primi passi nel mondo social:

  • Valuta bene il fattore tempo: un profilo inattivo per settimane non è un bel biglietto da visita.
  • Cerca di dare un valore aggiuntivo oltre alla condivisione dei tuoi link.
  • Parla con i tuoi follower, cerca di creare un rapporto umano, lasciati rapire dal potere social della rete.
  • Hai contenuti freschi per aggiornare un profilo come Twitter o Facebook?
  • Essere sui social vuol dire essere social: preparati al confronto e alla discussione.
  • Attenzione alla differenza tra prifilo e Facebook Fan Page.
  • Mettiti sempre in gioco e non essere spammoso!

Potrei continuare all'infinito ma l'argomento è davvero ampio. Per questo ti consiglio di dare uno sguardo alla Twitter Guide Book e alla Facebook Guide Book di Mashable, due punti di riferimento per il tuo lavoro.

Qual è il segreto?

Come sempre non ci sono segreti e formule speciali per fare passi avanti: devi lavorare sodo, produrre buoni contenuti e portarli sotto il naso dei tuoi potenziali lettori. Non ragionare solo in termini di quantità ma anche di qualità, cerca di instaurare un rapporto con chi ti segue e con gli altri blogger.

E porta avanti il tuo lavoro con continuità e professionalità!

Ciao! Ok, ho aperto un blog… e adesso? e' un post scritto da Riccardo Esposito, signore e padrone di My Social Web, che ti consiglia di dare uno sguardo anche alle Guide per Blogger.

Vuoi leggere ancora qualcosa?


Original Page: http://www.mysocialweb.it/?p=11751



Inviato da iPad

[Guida] Calibrare il tasto HOME dell'iPhone o dell'iPad


[Guida] Calibrare il tasto HOME dell'iPhone o dell'iPad

Se con l'utilizzo del tasto HOME del vostro iPhone, iPad o iPod Touch notate problemi di risposta potete provare a correggere l'incoveniente effettuando una calibrazione con 3 semplici passaggi. Vediamo come:

  • Aprite una applicazione nativa dell'iPhone ( Borsa, Meteo,ecc..)
  • Premete il tasto di accensione/spegnimento finche non compare la barra di spegnimento (non spegnete l'iPhone)
  • Premete ora il tasto HOME per alcuni secondi fino a quando non scompare la barra di spegnimento e ricompare la schermata iniziale

Se il problema persiste, molto probabilmente la causa sarà Hardware.

 

 

Ecco anche un video che vi spiega visivamente le operazioni da effettuare:

{youtube}cujErKjh85o{/youtube}


Original Page: http://www.ipadforumitalia.com/guide/guida-calibrare-il-tasto-home-delliphone-o-dellipad.html



Inviato da iPad

CableBox, la scatola che fa sparire i cavi – recensione



Inviato da iPad

giovedì 22 dicembre 2011

Use Motivational Fit to Market Products and Ideas


Use Motivational Fit to Market Products and Ideas

Every marketer knows that people want more good things — good products, experiences, and ideas — and fewer bad ones. What they may not realize, however, is something that research psychologists have known (and kept mostly to themselves) for over two decades: there are two fundamentally different kinds of good. Tailor your message to match the kind of "good" you are selling, and you can increase consumer trust, message believability, engagement, and perceived value. Mismatch, and your message falls flat. So, what kinds of "good" do people want?

Some people tend to see their goals as opportunities for gain or advancement. In other words, they are focused on all the great things that will happen for them when they succeed — the benefits and rewards. Psychologists call this promotion motivation, and research shows that promotion-minded people are more energized by optimism and praise, more likely to embrace risk, seize opportunities, and excel at creativity and innovation.

Others tend to see their goals as opportunities to avoid loss and to stay safe. They don't want to lose what they have worked hard to achieve, and they worry about all the terrible things that might happen if they make a mistake. Psychologists call this prevention motivation, and the prevention-minded are more driven by criticism and the looming possibility of failure than they are by applause and a sunny outlook. Prevention-focused people are more risk-averse, but their work is also more thorough, accurate, and carefully planned.

It's not just people who have different motivational focuses — products, activities, and ideas can have them too. Some are obvious: seat belts, home security systems, and mammograms are essentially about avoiding loss (prevention), while vacation homes, lottery tickets, and facelifts are about potential gains (promotion). Others can be either promotion or prevention-focused, depending on how you talk about them. When toothpaste is about a "whiter smile," it's a promotion product. But when it's about "avoiding cavities," it's all prevention.

You can more effectively market a product if you tailor your message to fit the motivational focus of the product or the audience you are aiming for. There are several ways to achieve a motivational fit, but the one that has been most frequently studied is the use of gain versus loss framing.

Promotion motivation makes us more sensitive to, and influenced by, information about gains. Studies show that people with a promotion focus (or people considering a promotion product or idea) are more deeply engaged when a product is described in terms of benefits. The same holds true for prevention motivation when descriptions emphasize avoiding loss.

Engaged customers reliably ascribe more value to the product in question, as demonstrated by changes in attitude, behavior, product enjoyment, and spending. In other words, people will pay more for a product — sometimes much more — if you describe their choice in a way that fits with their motivation.

The nuances in description can be subtle. If you are selling cars, you can choose to talk about "better mileage" (promotion) or "lower fuel costs" (prevention). You can emphasize the "bonus" features customers get if they buy the Limited Edition, or what they'd be missing out on if they didn't buy it. If you are offering a loyalty program at your coffee shop, should you offer 10% off each cup, or tell them that after buying nine cups they get one free? What the customer gets in the end may be the same, but how they get there - through the promotion-focused strategy of seizing opportunities to gain (e.g., better mileage, bonus features, a free cup of coffee) or the prevention-focused strategy of avoiding losses (e.g., high fuel costs, an inferior product, having to pay full price for their morning joe), can be the difference between psychological night and day.

Knowing which version will be more effective for your audience, for your particular message or product, is the key to finding fit. For example, when Welch's Grape Juice was described in an advertisement as energy-enhancing (a promotion product), potential buyers rated the brand more positively when the ad was gain-framed ("Get energized!") than when it was loss-framed ("Don't miss out on getting energized!"). But when the juice was instead described as a source of antioxidants that prevent cancer and heart disease (a prevention product), the loss-framing ("Don't miss out on preventing clogged arteries!") was more effective than gain-framing ("Prevent clogged arteries!")

Similar results have been found for other products, including sunscreen, vitamin supplements, toothpaste, and gym memberships. Teen anti-smoking ads and messages advocating social policy issues (e.g, funding after-school programs) were more effective when they were designed with motivational fit. In one study, people ate 20% more fruits and vegetables after reading about their benefits in messages framed to fit their dominant motivation. In another, promotion- and prevention-focused participants paid 50-70% more for a mug that was gain or loss-framed, respectively.

To create motivational fit, you always want to keep both the qualities of the product and the motivation of your audience in mind, particularly when you are trying to position a particular product to a target population. Age is one indicator of how someone is generally motivated (along with culture, occupation, and a number of other demographic variables.) Younger people are, on average, more promotion-minded, and are drawn to opportunity. They are more likely to value the possibility for growth, advancement, and creative expression. They are also more comfortable with risk, and more likely to engage with a product or idea when it is gain-framed.

Older adults, on the other hand, tend to be more prevention-minded — they are looking for a safe bet. They want reliability and security. They want to protect what they've earned. They are, on average, less comfortable with risk, and more likely to engage when you use loss-framing.

Motivational fit is a powerful, and largely overlooked, tool of influence. When you tailor your message with promotion and prevention motivations in mind, your audience will like it more, and trust it more. They will find your arguments more convincing, or your story more compelling. And if you are selling something, they will value it more, and be willing to pay more for it. Best of all, they will be more satisfied with their decision to endorse your idea or purchase your product — which makes motivational fit a tool you can feel genuinely good about using.


Original Page: http://feeds.harvardbusiness.org/~r/harvardbusiness/~3/JiTjr9XZIYg/use_motivational_fit_to_market.html



Inviato da iPad

Be More Productive by Making Better Daily Choices


Be More Productive by Making Better Daily Choices

The quest for efficiency and productivity improvement that permeates the corporate world trickles down from entire organizations, to teams, to projects and, finally, to individuals. At the most personal level, we make many choices that affect our productivity. Choices as simple as whether we use on-line banking, have a face-to-face meeting or set up a WebEx or Telepresence conference, send a written thank you note or an e-mail. Most of the time, the same technology that enables each and every one of us to multi-task and be always "on call" and consider trade-offs that didn't exist in the past.

As a working mother, these trade-offs that affect my personal productivity go far beyond the corporate environment. For example, a few years ago I requested a parent-teacher teleconference or Skype conference because I could not be at the school in person on a given day. That was a completely new experience for the teacher (and for me) but created an alternative way to have a parent-teacher conference for many other parents. When one year I accepted the challenge of being the PTO President for my children's school, I persuaded some of the PTO committee leads to run their "meetings" via conference calls. The key lesson learned was that most systems that are effective in the corporate environment can also increase productivity in our personal lives.

This programmatic approach to managing our personal lives calls for thinking about our day-to-day duties as a collection of small projects. Whether you label your to-dos "projects" or something else, at the end of the day, each line item is a exactly that: a project. Therefore, the way we manage work projects is perfectly applicable. Prioritizing, sequencing, delegating, and thinking from right to left should be part of our personal lives just as it is part of our business lives. Try planning the week in advance. Think about everything that needs to be accomplished that week and then put in buckets: (1) needs to be done in person (or requires driving), (2) can resolved by e-mail or phone and (3) can be delegated (to husband, children, baby-sitter, assistant or friend, etc).

Then allocate times to "get stuff done" — for example, email tasks can be done out of commercial hours but "needs-to-be done in-person" tasks will likely be performed during work hours. Regarding these tasks, consider itineraries: anything that can be dropped-off, picked up on the way to work, for example. I know it sounds basic and intuitive, but without a systematic approach, how many times do we find ourselves going back-and-forth just because we didn't take five minutes to think about what needed to be done and how the task could be accomplished. I would even suggest having a running list of things to be done in a certain part o the city, or on rainy weekends (e.g., that closet that needs to be organized).

Finally, once you delegate something, disengage from the temptation of inspecting the process or finding out if it is being done "your" way. Agree on the expected outcomes and just let go. I've lost count of how many times I have seen managers delegating the development of a presentation to an employee and then spending more time in edits, changes, and corrections than if they had done it themselves. Had the manager agreed on the expected outcome and then stepped out of the way, the process would have been much more efficient and the end product most like much better.

The same is true at home. Last weekend a friend decided that her husband would be in charge of putting up holiday decorations with the children. After their third trip to the hardware store to buy yet a new string of lights — the previous couple of trips yielded light strings that were either too short, had the wrong color string, or both — she called me in desperation, ready to run intervention. My only advice: "disengage."

Accept the fact that you delegated and they are not doing it in the most efficient way you would have done (hopefully, in a single trip to the store). Had my friend intervened — the equivalent to micromanaging or taking over at work — she would have created a lot of frustration and would have spoiled all the fun. The same is true for your employees.

Finally, keep one list only for all your obligations: work and personal. Prioritize by level of urgency and criticality. Otherwise, you will end up prioritizing twice. This will also make it easier to communicate to your family or co-workers why you can, can't, will, or won't make certain commitments. This blog, for example, topped my projects list for today. I hope it is helpful and am looking forward to hearing what works for you.


Original Page: http://feeds.harvardbusiness.org/~r/harvardbusiness/~3/ghsJ8IF1dqU/the_quest_for_efficiency_and.html



Inviato da iPad

Google Will Change Web Marketing in 2012


Google Will Change Web Marketing in 2012

Google is poised to completely alter how websites market themselves over the next year. While easing users into changing search results pages, Google has also designed a new method for websites to structure data so that its crawler can better pull information. This is a tremendous strategy. Google doesn't need to own all of the information in the world, but does own the methods of accessing that information — as well as the ability to advertise to people who use that access.

Search results will include more direct information.
Early in 2012, Google will expand how it incorporates data into its search results. For search queries that are direct questions, it will no longer be necessary to click through to a website. In Google's parlance, it's like getting both the search results and the immediate result of the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button at once. It's not hard to see how this is better for the average Google user. Questions will be answered faster and more simply. No parsing of information will be required. This change, however, will take value away from marketers who rely on visitors clicking through to deeper pages.

Google is looking to collect more data by providing ways for website owners to structure their information so that it can be easily read by a computer. Google's plans revolve around metadata (literally, special data encoded in the page) that will allow it to access more rich data about a topic, including hours of business, names of products, and virtually anything else that you can think of. Marketers will see better search rankings if they document information using this new format.

Google is entering new industries and markets. The expansion of data into search results pages is also breaking into markets where Google is not yet a force. Google acquired ITA Software in 2010, a software company that created airfare and travel management software for airlines and resellers. Since then, they have worked to become a powerful competitor in the travel industry by promoting their own offers and packages directly on the search results page ahead of other providers. To see this in action, try searching for "BOS to SFO" in Google. This is a tremendous advertising presence that others cannot match.

If you're a marketer working on making sure your site is visible in an area where Google is competitive, remember that you may need to do more than an organic search or paid advertising in order to be successful. Google has created a system where people must pay in order to compete against it. Regardless of whether the information and options available to searchers are free or paid for by marketers, people will continue to use Google in overwhelming numbers as long as Google continues to have the best results for a given search.

The data that Google makes available will be reduced. Google now sees its ownership of data as a competitive advantage to be protected from marketers and other advertising networks. In the latter half of 2011, Google began to roll out changes that have taken data away from marketers, specifically about how and where visitors found their website. Since October, between 10-15% of visits to websites from Google have no longer sent information to webmasters and marketers. It is safe to assume that Google will continue to expand these changes, further limiting the data available to marketers unless they're willing to pay.

Google's activity in the second half of 2011 represents just the beginning of the changes that it will be pushing throughout 2012 as it establishes even stronger relationships with its partners, affiliates, and advertisers. While this happens, every marketer on the web will need to carefully consider and revisit how they are positioned with the search giant and its interests.


Original Page: http://feeds.harvardbusiness.org/~r/harvardbusiness/~3/pjIirP4IS2A/google_will_change_web_marketi.html



Inviato da iPad

martedì 20 dicembre 2011

The Four Ps Of Marketing Need A Facelift



Inviato da iPad

Steve Jobs: 20 Life Lessons


Steve Jobs: 20 Life Lessons


My feelings about Steve Jobs have always been a little mixed. I long admired his entrepreneurial spirit and business acumen and was in sheer awe of his natural instincts for what appeals to consumers. On the other hand I bristled at what I saw as his — and by extension Apple's — occasionally capricious and even contradictory actions (App store products in or out, inability to get in front of product issues, antennaegate) and super-secretive nature.

Now, having finished the 600-plus page Steve Jobs biography by Walter Isaacson, I think I finally understand Steve Jobs. Like most of us, his personality had many sides. He could be aloof, super-intense, odd, gross, passionate, creative, driven, unfair, conciliatory and deeply introspective. He lived a rich and unique life.

As I read the tome on my Kindle, I highlighted interesting, surprising and relevant passages. Now, as I look back at them I realize that many help illustrate some of the larger lessons we can all glean from Steve Jobs' remarkable life.

Don't Wait

When the young Steve Jobs wanted to build something and needed a piece of equipment, he went straight to the source.

"He began by recalling that he had wanted to build a frequency counter when he was twelve, and he was able to look up Bill Hewlett, the founder of HP, in the phone book and call him to get parts."

Make Your Own Reality

Steve Jobs learned early that when you don't like how things are in your life or in your world, change them, either through action or sheer force of will.

"As Hoffman later lamented, "The reality distortion field can serve as a spur, but then reality itself hits." – Joanna Hoffman, part of Apple's early Macintosh team.

"I didn't want to be a father, so I wasn't," Jobs later said, with only a touch of remorse in his voice.

Control Everything You Can

Steve Jobs was, to a certain degree, a hippie. However, unlike most free spirits of the 1960s-to-1970s love-in era, Jobs was a detail-oriented control freak.

"He wants to control his environment, and he sees the product as an extension of himself."

Own Your Mistakes

Jobs could be harsh and even thoughtless. Perhaps nowhere was that more in evidence than with his first daughter. Still, as Jobs grew older and began to face mortality, he more readily admitted his mistakes.

"I've done a lot of things I'm not proud of, such as getting my girlfriend pregnant when I was twenty-three and the way I handled that," Jobs said."

Know Yourself

While not always aware of how those around him were reacting to his appearance or demeanor, Jobs had no illusions about his own formidable intellectual skills.

"Then a more disconcerting discovery began to dawn on him: He was smarter than his parents."

Leave the Door Open for the Fantastic

Jobs was a seeker, pursuing spiritual enlightenment and body purification throughout his life. He wasn't a particularly religious person, but did not dismiss the existence or something beyond our earth-bound realm.

"I think different religions are different doors to the same house. Sometimes I think the house exists, and sometimes I don't. It's the great mystery." — Steve Jobs

Don't Hold Back

Apple's founder was famous for his outbursts and sometimes over-emotional responses. In product development, things were often amazing or sh_t.

"He was an enlightened being who was cruel," she recalled. "That's a strange combination."– former girlfriend and mother of Jobs' first daughter, Chrisann Brennan

Surround Yourself with Brilliance

Whether he was willing to admit it or not, Steve Jobs could not do everything. Yes, he could have a huge impact on every product and marketing campaign, but he also knew that there were others in the world with skills he did not possess. Jobs' early partnership with Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak perfectly illustrated this fact. His early success with Wozniak provided the template for future collaborations.

"After a couple of months he was ready to test it. 'I typed a few keys on the keyboard and I was shocked! The letters were displayed on the screen.' It was Sunday, June 29, 1975, a milestone for the personal computer. "It was the first time in history," Wozniak later said, "anyone had typed a character on a keyboard and seen it show up on their own computer's screen right in front of them."

Build a Team of A Players

Far too often, companies and managers settle for average employees. Steve Jobs recognized talent and decided that any conflict that might arise from a company full of "A"-level players would be counterbalanced by awesome output. He may have been right.

"For most things in life, the range between best and average is 30% or so. The best airplane flight, the best meal, they may be 30% better than your average one. What I saw with Woz was somebody who was fifty times better than the average engineer. He could have meetings in his head. The Mac team was an attempt to build a whole team like that, A players. People said they wouldn't get along, they'd hate working with each other. But I realized that A players like to work with A players, they just didn't like working with C players."– Steve Jobs

"I've learned over the years that when you have really good people you don't have to baby them," Jobs later explained. "By expecting them to do great things, you can get them to do great things."

Be Yourself

Steve Jobs was often so busy being himself that he had no idea how people saw him, especially in his early, dirty-hippie days.

"At meetings we had to look at his dirty feet. Sometimes, to relieve stress, he would soak his feet in the toilet, a practice that was not as soothing for his colleagues."—Mike Markkula, Apple's first chairman.

Be Persuasive

While it's true that early Steve Jobs was a somewhat smelly and unpleasant person to be around, this same Steve Jobs also trained himself to stare without blinking for long periods of time and found that he could persuade people to do the seemingly impossible.

"If it could save a person's life, would you find a way to shave ten seconds off the boot time?" he asked. Kenyon allowed that he probably could. Jobs went to a whiteboard and showed that if there were five million people using the Mac, and it took ten seconds extra to turn it on every day, that added up to three hundred million or so hours per year that people would save, which was the equivalent of at least one hundred lifetimes saved per year."

Show Others the Way

Jobs wasn't truly a programmer or technologist, certainly not in the way that Microsoft founder Bill Gates is, yet he had an intuitive understanding for technology and design that ended up altering the world's expectations for computers and, more importantly, consumer electronics.

"To be honest, we didn't know what it meant for a computer to be 'friendly' until Steve told us." — Terry Oyama, part of the early Macintosh design team.

Trust Your Instincts

I have, in my own career, navigated by gut on more than one occasion. Steve Jobs, though, had a deep and abiding belief in his own tastes and believed with utter certainty that if he liked something, the public would as well. He was almost invariably right.

"Did Alexander Graham Bell do any market research before he invented the telephone?" — Steve Jobs

Take Risks

Throughout his career, Steve Jobs took chances, first with the launch of Apple, then in walking away from it and then returning in 1997. In an era when most companies were figuring out ways to diversify, Apple — under Job's leadership — shed businesses and products, and focused on relatively few areas. He was also willing to steer the entire Apple ship (or at least some aspects of it) in a single direction if he thought it would generate future success.

"One of Jobs' management philosophies was that it is crucial, every now and then, to roll the dice and 'bet the company' on some new idea or technology."

"I had this crazy idea that we could sell just as many Macs by advertising the iPod. In addition, the iPod would position Apple as evoking innovation and youth. So I moved $75 million of advertising money to the iPod, even though the category didn't justify one hundredth of that. That meant that we completely dominated the market for music players. We outspent everybody by a factor of about a hundred." — Steve Jobs.

Follow Great with Great

In everything from products to movies (under Pixar), Steve Jobs sought to create great follow-ups. He wasn't so successful in the early part of his career (see Lisa), but his third acts to Pixar and Apple proved he had the sequel touch.

"There's a classic thing in business, which is the second-product syndrome," Jobs later said. It comes from not understanding what made your first product so successful. "I lived through that at Apple. My feeling was, if we got through our second film, we'd make it."

Make Tough Decisions

Good managers and leaders are willing to do hard work and, often, make unpopular decisions. Jobs apparently had little concern about being liked and therefore was well-equipped to make tough choices.

"The most visible decision he made was to kill, once and for all, the Newton, the personal digital assistant with the almost-good handwriting-recognition system."

Presentation Can Make a World of Difference

The Apple founder hated PowerPoint presentations, but perhaps somewhat uncharacteristically, believed elegant product presentation was critical.

"Packaging can be theater, it can create a story." — Jony Ive, Apple designer.

Find a Way to Balance Your Intensity

It's unclear if Steve Jobs ever truly mellowed, but he did learn that a buffer between him and the rest of Apple could be useful.

"In a company that was led by a CEO prone to tantrums and withering blasts, Cook commanded situations with a calm demeanor, a soothing Alabama accent, and silent stares."

Live for Today

Even as Steve Jobs struggled with cancer, he rarely slowed down. If anything, the disease helped him focus his efforts and pursue some of his grandest dreams.

"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life." — Steve Jobs

"Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart." — Steve Jobs

Share Your Wisdom

Steve Jobs was not a philanthropic soul. He had a passion for products and success, but it wasn't until he became quite ill that he started reaching out and offering his wisdom to others in the tech community.

"I will continue to do that with people like Mark Zuckerberg too. That's how I'm going to spend part of the time I have left. I can help the next generation remember the lineage of great companies here and how to continue the tradition. The Valley has been very supportive of me. I should do my best to repay." — Steve Jobs


Bonus: 15 Inspirational Steve Jobs Quotes






Jobs quote from 2005 Stanford commencement address. Posted by livinglauren.

Click here to view this gallery.

More About: Apple iPad, iOS 5, iphone, iPod Touch, steve jobs

For more Mobile coverage:


Original Page: http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/mashable/mobile/~3/rh7TcQnsXZk/



Inviato da iPad

Converting Your Map Into a Microsoft Word Document


Converting Your Map Into a Microsoft Word Document

One of the very useful features of MindManager is the ability to convert a map into a Word document with just a few mouse clicks.  After you've captured a lot of information in your map there is often the need to share it with those who prefer a more linear format, such as Micorosoft Word.

Converting a Map to a Word Document with MindManager

Suppose you have a map like this (click to enlarge):

Only visible topics are exported. This means you can apply a filter to hide a set of topics you don't want to include in the Word document:

Take a look at the map in Outline View first for a general idea of what the exported Word document will look like (click to enlarge):

 

The Outline View also shows the notes, links and attachments contained in the map.  All notes will be expanded in the Word document and links and attachments will be referenced.

To convert your Map to a Word Document do the following:

  • Click the File tab, click Export, and then click Export to Microsoft Word.
  • The default name for the document will be the map name, but you can change this and the location where it is saved. Click Save.
  • The Microsoft Word Export Settings dialog box appears, so you can tailor the export to your liking (click to enlarge):
  • On the General tab, choose the outline numbering scheme, which information to include, and export options for other map elements.
  • On the Word Template tab, select the Word template for the document and how topic levels correspond to Word styles.
  • On the Advanced tab, select the treatment for relationships, hyperlinks, attachments, and map graphics.
  • A message appears when the export is done. You can Open the document to check it, Open Folder where it was saved or Close to return to MindManager.

After making the appropriate settings, select Export.

Your map is now converted to a Word Document (click to enlarge):

 

 

Related posts:

  1. Organizing Your Research with Mindjet Connect
  2. Mindjet's 7-Step Process for Effective Team Collaboration


Original Page: http://mindmapblog.com/?p=4015



Inviato da iPad

Twitter: un anno di hashtag



Inviato da iPad

Can a Consultant Become a Manager, or a President?


Can a Consultant Become a Manager, or a President?

Here in the United States, the presidential election cycle gives us the opportunity to publicly discuss the characteristics of good leaders. Running a country calls for a sophisticated array of leadership skills — from shaping strategy to building a team to managing day-to-day operations. Choosing a candidate therefore requires thoughtfulness about what experiences provide the best training for a good leader.

A recent New York Times article by David Leonhardt explores the issue of whether Mitt Romney's consulting background enhances his qualifications as a potential president, particularly since Romney himself cites his track record with the Boston Consulting Group and Bain Capital to show that he knows how to "solve problems." But whether we're talking about Romney or not, it's important to question whether consulting is good preparation for leadership. After all, as Leonhardt points out, many top business school graduates start their careers with large consulting firms. So as many of these talented people migrate into managerial roles, it's worth asking: Are they ready to lead?

Of course there is no absolute answer to this question, and examples can be cited to support either side. For example, McKinsey alumni Lou Gerstner and Jeff Skillings both went on to lead large corporations. Gerstner turned around IBM and developed a reputation as one of the most effective executives ever — while Skillings played a major role in destroying Enron and ended up in jail.

As an alternative, let's look at several characteristics of successful consultantsand determine whether these would be the same or different for successful leaders. Here are three such characteristics:

Deep analytical skills: Effective consultants can usually crunch through large amounts of data to identify patterns and opportunities. Logical conclusions drawn from this data then underpin their recommendations. Good leaders also need analytical skills to help them sort through divergent views and, whenever possible, to make data-based decisions. However, leaders also need to appreciate the limitations of data and have the courage to follow their instincts when the data is either inconclusive or just doesn't feel right. Steve Jobs, for example, often relied less on market research than on his gut feel for what customers would want. And while he was sometimes wrong, more often his instincts were on target.

Objectivity and detachment: In difficult situations, consultants need to stay objective and go where the data leads them. To do this, they have to avoid emotional attachment and deliver bad news without feeling guilty about the consequences for individuals. Leaders also have to maintain objectivity and make tough calls that can negatively affect people — but do so with a genuine sense of compassion. Employees can accept bad news, but they generally don't want to work for people who don't care. That's why Jack Welch used to talk about the need for his leaders to be "hard-headed and soft-hearted" — to make decisions in the best interest of the business but to remember that those decisions often have human costs.

Accountability: Most consultants say that their job is to get results. But most of the time this means identifying what the client needs to do to get results. In other words, most consultants take accountability for the quality of their recommendations, but not for their implementation: That's the client's job. Effective leaders, however, take end-to-end accountability for achieving results — from problem identification to strategy development to execution.

Looking at these three characteristics suggests that while consulting may be a useful background for an organizational leader, it's certainly not sufficient. In fact if consultants-turned-managers don't go beyond these core consulting characteristics, they are likely to fail.

So if you're looking to make a career shift from consulting to management, think about whether you can combine intuition with your analytical ability, compassion with your toughness, and implementation with your ideas. And if you're looking to choose a former consultant as a candidate for president, think about whether that person can add to his core consulting characteristics as well.


What's your view: Can a consultant become a good leader?


Original Page: http://feeds.harvardbusiness.org/~r/harvardbusiness/~3/BlWtFuhLVvU/can-a-consultant-become-a-mana.html



Inviato da iPad

venerdì 16 dicembre 2011

The Top Ten Best (and Worst) Communicators of 2011


The Top Ten Best (and Worst) Communicators of 2011

Our Top Ten Communicators List is all about Trust and Vision. Happily, we start with the Best list, where we honor those who communicate and lead well. Unfortunately, those who dominate the Worst list have garnered most of the attention in 2011 – for lack of trust on the high end and deception on the low end.

We have seen the fall of giants, as well as the sleaze of some we have never heard of. Just put these names together: Sandusky, Paterno, McQueary, Cain, Bialek, White, Fine, Boeheim, Sheen, Weiner and the list could go on and on to include CEO's, politicians, Trustees, and celebrities. We name some of them in our Worst list, but we do not get into those tainted by the many sexual abuse cases that have reared their ugly heads in the last few months. Too much "he said, she said" and outright lying – we really yearn for those we can hear, trust, and follow. So here they are – on the Best list:

The 10 Best

1. Steve Jobs – perhaps the communicator of the decade, or century.

Steve Jobs is the rare one who creates and develops vision, communicates it clearly and colorfully, and then leads to completion. He has been on our Best list four times, was #1 in 2005, and presented his iconic intro of the iPhone in 2007. He not only transformed technology and the way we live, but he also transformed the way business communicates. Renowned for his Apple product introductions he moved the word "rock star" into the business world. For CEO's, speaking will never be the same. No more Death by PowerPoint – he just uses a few visuals, and then speaks from the heart. Well rehearsed, but real – authentic, and always with a message. Perhaps his greatest "speech" was at the Stanford University commencement in 2005. His message continues to echo and be a model for not only business, but the larger world. We will miss him.

2. Howard Schultz – the all around business leader/communicator.

Schultz uses excellent communications to consistently lead Starbucks to success. He began the Starbucks journey in 1987 when he had to convince people to invest and buy at the start, then inspire with vision to grow. Then in 2008 Schultz had to communicate with firmness tough decisions to fire and close stores in turning around Starbucks when they had lost their way. This year he wrote a best seller, Onward, and also we did a blog post on how he elevated his communications to join in national, political and economic dialogue. Always the innovator, now he is visioning a new juice brand with his purchase of Evolution Fresh. All this is the work of a master leader/communicator.

3. Chris Anderson – elevating speech in the TED format.

Founder of the wildly popular TED Talks, Anderson is a visionary who uses speaking and video communication to contribute to the world around him. His ability to verbalize the essence of TED continues to inspire the best and the brightest to participate, leaving viewers with hours of juicy content to imbibe. People are so inspired by the concept that there are independent mini-TED conferences springing up all over the world – and Anderson continues to speak out to support the movement. His challenge to companies to add value when advertising with Ads Worth Spreading is another mark of Chris Anderson as a leader and innovator in the world of communications.

4. Virginia Rometty – communicating on the fast track.

For the last seven years Fortune named Virginia Rometty as one of the top 50 most influential women (#8 this year) – for good reason. This year she became the first female CEO of IBM. And as bright as she was and is, it was largely her communications that elevated her. Leadership is executed through communications, and 'Ginni' is likeable, strong, memorable, and connects with large audiences in a very authentic style. She is a natural at incorporating SHARPs in all her communication, and does it skillfully and naturally.  Their stock is at an all time high – and we doubt that it's a coincidence.

5. Chris Christie – a political poster child for authenticity.

Although it seems like every year now is a political year, this one is a whopper. With Obama already actively campaigning for 2012, over 30! Republican debates, and allegations flying at many of the candidates – who do we believe? Who is authentic? Chris Christie leads the pack – for even his enemies say that he means what he says and says what he means. His manner is direct, often gruff, more often funny. But few question his sincerity, as he is unique in refusing to run in order to finish his job as Governor. Many Republicans wish he was running in the primary, for it's no coincidence that his communication skills match his ability to get things done in turning around the economy in New Jersey against all political odds. He can persuade public opinion with the best of them.

6. Lady Gaga – speaking out with multi-dimensional creativity.

She's full of surprises and loves to shock us, but what's even more surprising is her communication ability. Although Lady Gaga projects a character that's pretty out there (think meat dress, rotary telephone sticking out of her head, and her new groundbreaking 14' music video) we can all learn from her creativity. She personifies originality and pushing the edge, and we all need to do a little more of that. Yet when she speaks, she's articulate. Gaga comes across well beyond her years – poised, confident, and sincere. When interviewed, especially about her Little Monsters (aka fans), her genuine adoration for them is clear, and she becomes again, surprisingly, human. Gaga can own a stage not only with her songs, but also with her goosebump-inducing cadence when delivering a speech.

7. Warren Buffett – years of consistent communications.

It's been a long time coming – Buffett lands himself on the list for his consistently strong communications over the years. While he is an investor and businessman, the way he speaks and conveys his ideas have made him an icon. He even has spoken on the importance of getting training in speaking! People look to him for wisdom and sage advice. He's a trusted leader, and known to say what he thinks, even if it's unexpected and potentially unpopular. Most notably this year, Buffett raised eyebrows with his call for more taxes on the wealthy. And his credibility is supreme, as he was the leader who corralled a bunch of other billionaires to give away their $$$ to charity – leading off with personally donating the largest charitable donation in U.S. history of $31 billion. He puts his money where his mouth is. Although he doesn't often give long speeches, he's authentic and powerful when he does, contributing to his long-cultivated reputation as a respected thought-leader.

8. Christine Lagarde – speaking powerfully from the top of the financial world.

She is elegant, stylish and stately – and tough as nails. It's not a wonder that Christine Lagarde was elected head of the IMF after the Dominick Strauss Kahn scandal. She was the one who could handle the turmoil, and bring direction to this large and important agency. She speaks with clarity and firmness, and in so doing, marks herself as one of the top communicators in the world. She is articulate yet pointed. She knows the facts yet summarizes the key points. She is calm, knowledgeable, measured, and yet forceful in IMF policy in Italy. With one of her most charming and powerful qualities being candor she speaks with firmness and grace, and handles interviews well. She communicates as the leader she is, and if Strauss hadn't vacated the post she would have ended up leading some other major organization.

9. Morgan Spurlock – high energy and a distinctive style puts him in his own films.

Whether he's stuffing his face with Big Macs or recruiting sponsors for his own 2011 TED Talk Spurlock's high energy and distinctive style continues to capture our attention. He puts himself in the middle of his documentaries, like his Academy Award nominated "Super Size Me" where he skillfully walks the line between outlandish and down to earth. Most recently his camera shined a light on movie product placement with "The Greatest Movie Ever Sold." It's Spurlock's pervasive curiosity, grab-a-beer-with-me approachability, and passion that keep us watching and waiting for his next expose.

10. Andy Rooney – a tribute to creating a unique communications experience.

This cranky, prickly mainstay communicator of 60 Minutes was 92 in age, but young in heart and vitality. Andy Rooney continued until his death stating it like it was – as he saw it. In all, he delivered 1,097 commentaries. You might have disagreed, but you would laugh along with him. His energy, forward lean, facial mannerisms and bushy eyebrows made him someone we enjoyed watching and listening to. He made every time we saw and heard him a unique communication experience, and we will miss his witty insights.

The 10 Worst

1. Anthony Weiner – poster child for deceptive communications.

There is a poster child for this year's theme of deception and evasion that is so pervasive in so many of the worst communicators of 2011. Anthony Weiner was a respected congressman – elected as much by his communications as his deeds. Using that same confident style, he was filled with puffed up outrage when claiming his Twitter account was hacked by someone else showing his lewd photos. Turns out we were the ones to be deceived by his lies, and when he fessed up that it was him who tweeted, he continued to obfuscate, trying to hang on to his office. But he had to hang it up, as his communications this time did him in. He had no apology, in both substance and style. He ultimately resigned in disgrace – because of the photos sure, but just as much because of communications that lacked any degree of humility, credibility and above all leadership. We don't follow liars very well.

2. Brian Harrison and Bill Stover – Solyndra execs just do not communicate.

It's never a good idea to NOT communicate when you are under fire, in business as well as in politics and sex scandals. Brevity and effective diversion is one thing, stonewalling is something else. When you take the 5th, you are shoving your communications right slap in the face of the public – unless you perhaps can do it with a smile, or sense of regret. No regret here, as both Harrison and Stover show how closed communications will not further the cause – but will doom it. Such performance reminds us of a few other Worst Communicators we featured here, like Mark McGuire in 2005. Communicating effectively is most critical under the toughest pressure – best to practice before. And it helps to not be guilty…

3. Charlie Sheen – erratic does not pay.

This can't be a huge surprise for anyone who has watched TV or read the news in the last year. Charlie Sheen lost control and went on a rampage not once, twice, but for a significant portion of 2011. While Sheen has come out saying it was "one weird phase," his sustained communication faux pas was much more – it was the start of his fall. Following the example of Mel Gibson (#5 on 2010 Worst List), Sheen lost his television role after unleashing a furious rant about his Two and a Half Men producer, and then spun off to rant across the country on a failed tour . As Sheen preached about winning, he was actually failing by becoming a joke. He may be attempting a comeback, but Sheen is a painfully clear example of how erratic communication can destroy a reputation, and perhaps a career.

4. The Murdochs & Ms. Brooks – followers communicate like their leaders.

This motley crew went on the defensive in the wake of their cell phone hacking scandal this year, communicating elusively and trying to get away with as much as possible. Father Rupert's history of aloofness and arrogance caught up with him this year, especially as he brushed off his apologies to those affected by the hackings. Son Jim spoke most during their parliamentary hearings and found himself hissing like a cornered animal, only further highlighting his deception. To top it off, News Corp staff Rebekah Brooks, when announcing to her News of the World team that they're jobless due to her mismanagement, spent most of the time talking about her own feelings – unsurprisingly, her staff pushed back on her arrogance. Guilty of bad journalism practices isn't the only question here – these three are guilty of poor communication.

5. Rick Perry – it's not just the one miscue, but the overall experience.

Rick Perry had the most publicized communication failure of the year with his brain freeze in remembering his third point in a very public setting. The Rule of Three is good, but you don't want to say "There are three things…" in advance in a very public forum such as a Presidential Debate unless you know you will remember them. Or have them in your notes. So he could have topped the Worst list with that faux pax along with his early amateurish debate performances, marked by halting mannerisms, jerky style and hostile attacks. But he's here in the middle because he recovered pretty well, mostly by poking fun at himself. So at least there's a positive learning point here – the power of humor.

6. Brian Moynihan – not ready for primetime.

Bank of America CEO Moynihan has had several missteps in his first year handling the $billion behemoth, from the $5 debit surcharge to the foreclosure fiasco. And at a time when clear communications and leadership was required, he stumbled, most notably when causing an uproar over his excuse that BofA has a "right to make a profit." You know you're in trouble when you're on a list of CEOs who need to be fired. Business leaders can't 'talk' transparency – they have to live it, and communicate it. Although the returns aren't in yet, Brian Moynihan has a long way to go to talk straight to re-establish trust with his customers and right the bank that so many feel wronged by.

7. Greg Mortensen – Three Cups of Deceit.

Communications built up the reputation and wallet of this author of the best selling "Three Cups of Tea". He leveraged that success and began receiving high priced fees for keynote speaking. He actually wasn't bad – and had a great message to tell about his humanitarian aid for Pakistan women. But that confidence and forward lean style disappeared when he was exposed by "60 Minutes" –  to have lied, and possibly misused charitable funds. Nowhere is guilt more apparent in communicating style than in this clip where he is confronted by a 60 minutes reporter – it's not just that he is caught off guard, it is his lack of eye communication, hesitation as well as subsequent behavior that shouts "guilty." He was asked to resign, and this was followed up by an acquaintance writing the book "Three Cups of Deceit" that is outselling the best seller. Character and integrity are the base for the tripod of good communications.

8. The Commissioners: Selig, Goodell and Stern – where leadership requires powerful communicators.

For missing the leadership opportunities in the NBA, NFL and MLB we might dub them the three blind mice – but certainly not the three wise men. Although it wasn't entirely the fault of David Stern, the NBA Commissioner helped the league lose a couple of months of their multi-billion dollar season this year. Under Bud Selig Major League Baseball lost hundreds of millions in one of the most devastating strikes of any league several years ago. We have no giants at the helm of the big three professional sports leagues  – remember Pete Rozell, Ford Frick, Larry O'brien and Peter Ueberoth, to name a few. They were leaders who communicated, where now we have Roger Goodell of the NFL – he holds himself so meekly we rarely hear of him, but at least he averted a strike. David Stern has been here since 1984 – he's been around the longest and may be the most offensive communication wise with his arrogance – holds his head high, pompously. Ironically, the healthiest league now is under the worst speaker of the three, Bud Selig, who was #4 on our Worst Communicators list in 2007. He tends to articulate as if his mouth is full of grapes. The Commissioners lead big strong athletes, and they need to be big, strong communicators.

9. Leo Apotheker – a bull in a china shop.

When one of the three key reasons you're fired as CEO is bad communication, you're going to make our list. Apotheker was known for going his own way, not communicating a clear vision for HP, not getting consensus and buy-in of his executive board, and standing at the helm as HP's stock lost nearly half it's value. The real nail in the coffin may have been his flopped August 18 announcement that HP would kill the Touch Pad and spin off the PC unit, a message that was unclear internally at HP and certainly to customers. Communicating both internally with boards and staff and externally with vision and promise is essential to great leadership. Apotheker fell short and lost a huge opportunity. You can't be a bull in a china shop without crashing a lot of plates.

10. President Barack Obama – needing to communicate to unite.

The President always appears on the list – sometimes best, sometimes worst – but the bully pulpit is so powerful in America that the communication style and impact of the President has influence far beyond the issues. So it is this year – as Obama, who once led the Best list in 2008, now is the best of the worst. We've often blogged on Obama's failure as a communicator. Here it is not so much deception as evasion – where the promise of Change and Hope was trumpeted from his Bully Pulpit so forcefully that everyone believed. No longer – as leadership from the White House, and from Congress as well, has stalled. Instead of a Presidential vision and message we have political maneuvering and name calling. When we need uniting, we hear dividing. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the politics of the name calling isn't the point – the learning is that when in a position of power, a leader must trumpet a direction in spite of the circumstances. (And not use a teleprompter to do it.)


Original Page: http://decker.com/blog/?p=2551



Inviato da iPad